
How to Expand Your Consciousness Using Archetypes
by Scott JeffreyHere’s an image of Rembrandt’s painting Philosopher in Meditation:
The light of the sun pours through the window. Sitting in meditation, the Philosopher absorbs the light in its reflection on the floor. He reflects on the light of consciousness, readying himself to ascend the spiral stairway to enlightenment.
The Philosopher is an archetype, akin to the Wise Old Man.
But what is an archetype? And how can we use them to elevate our consciousness, support our development, and increase our achievements?
Table of Contents
- Archetypes Defined
- Archetypes are Everywhere
- Why the Psychology of Archetypes Are Important
- What Do Archetypes Do?
- A Map of the Human Mind
- Why Many People Are Afraid of This Stuff: A 100-Year Bias in Psychology
- Archetypes: A Doorway to Behavioral Change
- How Psychological Archetypes Dominate Our Behavior
- Archetypes: A Doorway to Knowing Yourself
- Four Methods for Working with Archetypes
- Working Alone versus with a Therapist
- The Key to Archetypal Psychology
- Further Reading and Exploration: Archetypes Psychology
Archetypes Defined
Plato may be the first philosopher to refer to archetypes. He called them Forms.
For Plato, there were two realities: the world we live in and the non-physical realm where the Forms exist.
These Forms, for Plato, are pre-existing ideal templates or blueprints. They include characteristics like roundness, softness, hardness, greenness, blackness, and so on.
Forms is another term for archetypes.
In modern times, psychiatrist Carl Jung made us aware of archetypes. He saw archetypes are the fundamental units of the human mind.
“Archetypes,” Jung wrote in The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, “are the living system of reactions and aptitudes that determine the individual’s life in invisible ways.”
Archetypes are Everywhere
Jung describes archetypes as the forms or images that occur all over the earth.
These images find their way into ancient religions, myths, legends, and fairy tales. We find evidence of archetypes in our dreams, fantasies, and behavior.
Every character in both our personal dreams and collective myths is an archetype.
We can observe archetypes in the characters of the stories we read, the films we watch, and the plays we attend.
Archetypes are pervasive throughout the arts, media, advertising, and pop culture.
They influence our relationships and interactions with others and ourselves.
Examples of common archetypes include:
Mother
Father
Warrior
Sage
Servant
Saboteur
Hero
Bully
Weakling
Monk
Manipulator
Caregiver
Child
King
Queen
Outlaw
Magician
Mentor
Wizard
Artist
Adventurer
Entertainer
Actor
Athlete
Tyrant
Tricker
Peacemaker
Prostitute
Psychopath
Villain
Vampire
Villain
Shapeshifter
But ultimately, every word or image represents an archetype. They are everywhere.
See also: The Ultimate List of Over 300 Archetypes
Why the Psychology of Archetypes Are Important
Archetypes are the secret forces behind human behavior.
Because archetypes reside in the unconscious—the part of our minds we aren’t aware of—they influence us without us knowing it.
“The archetypes,” Marie-Louise von Franz writes in Archetypal Dimensions of the Psyche, “are inherited dispositions, which cause us to react in a typical way to basic human problems, inner or outer.”
Archetypes are influencing everything you do, think, and feel. And they are influencing everyone around you in a similar way.
Through the exercises in this guide, you can get to know the archetypes expressing themselves through you and others. You can learn the patterns that influence most of human behavior.
When you can observe an archetype operating within you, you have differentiated yourself from the archetype.
This differentiation is important because when you can separate yourself from an archetype, it’s less likely to influence your behavior in deleterious ways.
What Do Archetypes Do?
Let’s review three of the roles archetypes play in our lives.
Archetypes Influence Behavior
How do archetypes influence our behavior?
Jung described archetypes as “the forms which the instincts assume.”
Instincts are like biological urges. When we trigger an instinct, it activates a pattern of behavior like running a software program on your computer.
Because these patterns are pre-existing, archetypes are predictable. No matter what image of the Hero you hold in mind, for example, certain patterns of behavior and personality traits arise like bravery, valor, persistence, and action.
So when you think of archetypes, think set patterns of behavior shared by all of humanity.
Archetypes Trigger Emotions
In Man and His Symbols, Jung explains that archetypes “are the pieces of life itself—images that are integrally connected to the living individual by the bridge of the emotions.”
When you experience an emotion, it is the emotion of an archetype.
Different archetypes evoke different emotions. Lovers are passionate. Kings are magnanimous. Warriors are courageous. Sadists are hateful.
Archetypes Provide Meaning
Every human being has an inner world. It’s the home of our fantasies, imagination, and emotional life. This inner world is the source of personal meaning.
Archetypes tap into the emotions of our inner world and give life a sense of personal meaning.
A Map of the Human Mind
Archetypes provide a powerful way to understand our minds.
We tend to think of the mind as a singular unit. “My mind” assumes a unified sense of self (or I).
But a careful examination of the mind shows this view to be incorrect. Instead of the mind being singular, it’s plural. A pantheon of archetypal characters exists in our minds.
Various forms of therapy seek to integrate these archetypal characters. They each have a different language to describe them.
In psychosynthesis, they call them subpersonalities. In Internal Family Systems, they are parts. (We’ll discuss these therapies below.)
Psychologist John Rowan defines a subpersonality as “a semi-permanent and semi-autonomous region of the personality capable of acting as a person.”
By whatever name, we come to see our minds as a collection of these semi-autonomous personalities, or archetypes.
In Re-Visioning Psychology, neo-Jungian James Hillman explains:
We are no longer single beings in the image of a single God, but are always constituted of multiple parts: impish child, hero or heroine, supervising authority, asocial psychopath, and so on.
Think of a film or TV show you watched recently. Now consider that all of the characters in that story—not just the hero or protagonist—are operating in your mind. They are all within you.
We begin to see how complex our minds are and the hidden, often opposing forces influencing our behavior.
Shakespeare observed this reality over 400 years ago:
All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances, And one man in his time plays many parts, His acts being seven ages.
Why Many People Are Afraid of This Stuff: A 100-Year Bias in Psychology
Sigmund Freud is the father of psychoanalysis. Freud was 20 years older than Carl Jung. Early in Jung’s career, Freud was a kind of mentor and father figure to him.
Jung thought they should name their emerging field psycheanalysis, that is, an analysis of the human mind, soul, and spirit.
Freud, however, opted for psychoanalysis, the study of psychotic, crazy, or mentally ill people. This decision helped set the direction of psychology for the next century.
What did Jung see that Freud didn’t? To Freud, his patients were mentally ill, while he as an analyst was mentally sound.
Jung, with greater humility, realized he was in the same mental condition as many of his patients. Jung saw that all of us were fragmented, divided, and ruled by unconscious forces.
Now, we associate hearing voices in our heads with being “crazy.” This stigma hinders our ability to get to know the archetypes within us.
The question isn’t whether you have voices in your head. The real issue is whether you’re conscious and receptive enough to hear them.
Our goal in working with archetypes is to bring the forces of the unconscious into balance with our conscious mind—to integrate the archetypes to come to psychic wholeness.
~~~~~~~~~~~

Galadriel, also called Lady of Light and Lady of the Golden Wood, is a character in J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. This character, played by Cate Blanchett in the films, represents the archetypes of the Earth Mother, Mother Nature, Goddess, and the feminine expression of the Self.
This archetype is powerful, dark, wise, and intuitive, able to peer into the hearts of men. She is not separate from nature and the earth; she is part of it. In fact, she is one with the flow of all life.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Archetypes: A Doorway to Behavioral Change
Emmanuel Donchin, Professor of Cognitive Psychophysiology at the University of South Florida, said:
“An enormous portion of cognitive activity [actions, emotions, behavior, and decisions] is non-conscious, figuratively speaking, it could be 99 percent.”
Although we don’t like to admit it, as a whole, human beings are mostly unconscious.
We remain unaware of our real motivations—what drives our actions, emotions, behavior, and decisions.
We are also unconscious of the emotions expressing themselves behind the social masks we each present to each other.
Most of the methods we use to change our behavior—from neuro-linguistic programming to cognitive behavioral therapy—have limited results.
They influence change of certain behaviors under certain conditions. But remove those conditions, and they always fail us.
These methods fail because they rely on the premise we can train the unconscious.
The belief is we can condition these primal forces to obey our conscious will.
We do not take into account the complexity of the human psyche and the persistent nature of these archetypes.
How Psychological Archetypes Dominate Our Behavior
Let’s say you’re addicted to eating junk food.
You manage okay during the day, but when you’re home in the evening, the impulse to consume salty snacks gets triggered.
We assume this is a battle of willpower: our base desires of our animal brain against our higher self or cerebral cortex.
But we don’t appreciate why this impulse gets triggered.
When you know about archetypes, you can train yourself to listen to their voices.
If you do, you may learn why these impulses occur.
A voice, for example, might say you’re pathetic, worthless, a loser. It might suggest you have no reason to live.
Now, we don’t hear these voices for two reasons.
First, we don’t know how to listen to them. Second, they are often unpleasant, and they make us feel bad.
And so our mind represses the voice. Instead of feeling depressed, we seek to elevate ourselves, to feel good.
We instantly crave a dopamine kick. The impulse to consume salty snacks, in this case, gets triggered.
Only when we can hear the voice of these archetypes and learn to dialogue with them, can we get to the problem’s source.
In this example, a part that feels like a pathetic loser.
Everyone battles with impulse control in one form or another. Addictive behavior is an area of tension for almost everyone.
We invest lots of energy trying to exert our willpower, restricting ourselves, or feeling ashamed of our weaknesses.
We work to establish better habits, improve ourselves, and achieve peak performance.
But ultimately, what undermines are conscious intention to be a better person are the archetypal forces within us.
We can save a lot of time and unnecessary anguish by addressing the issue at the source.
Archetypes: A Doorway to Knowing Yourself
Archetypal psychology is a powerful way of getting to know your psyche. It’s also a means of understanding the motivations of others.
The more you can identify the archetypes in others, you more you can see the patterns of behavior within yourself.
Conversely, the more you can witness these behavioral patterns in yourself, the more understanding you’ll have for others.
The ancient Greeks were the last civilization that appreciated the power of archetypes. The Greeks called them Gods and Goddesses.
Hal and Ira Stone, psychologists and authors of Embracing Our Selves, explain:
In ancient Greece there was an understanding that one was required to worship all the Gods and Goddesses. You might have your favorites, but none of the remaining deities could be ignored. The God or Goddess whom you ignored became the one who turned against you and destroyed you. So it was with the Trojan war. So it is with consciousness work. The energy pattern that we disown turns against us.
Our need to understand and work with archetypes is greater now than at any point in human history. Why?
In past generations, humanity had rich mythologies and rituals designed to maintain psychic order.
That is, the ancient rituals of the past—those of which modern people perceive to be archaic—maintained a balanced relationship with archetypal forces.
Through the course of human evolution, beginning with the Age of Enlightenment (the 1700s), we have been breaking down these mythological structures. Now, it’s “every man for himself.”
Many scholars from Joseph Campbell to Robert Moore speak about the need in modern times to establish rituals that organize and evoke the archetypes in constructive ways.
Four Methods for Working with Archetypes
Let’s review four different ways to approach archetypal psychology.
The goal of these “integrative therapies” is to liberate yourself from being dominated by archetypes and abide in the Self.
The Self is an organizing principle within our minds that maintain balance or psychic order. You can access this Self when you’re in the Center—in a state of mastery.
Method #1: Dream Work
Jung offered two tools for navigating the archetypes of the unconscious: dream work and active imagination.
Dreams are one way the unconscious speaks to us. But dreams don’t communicate in a direct, logical manner. They communicate to us in symbols. And these symbols represent archetypal forces.
In Inner Work, psychologist Robert Johnson offers four basic steps to working with dreams:
- Making associations from the dream images
- Connecting dream images to inner dynamics
- Interpreting these dream images
- Doing rituals to make the dream concrete
One way to connect to your subpersonalities is to think of each dream figure as an actual person living inside you.
“Think of each person in your dream,” Johnson writes, “as one of the autonomous personalities that coexist within your psyche and combine to make up your total self.”
The goal of Jungian psychology is to integrate certain archetypes, leading to the Archetypal Self, or God within.
Method #2: Active Imagination
Active imagination is Jung’s other way of getting to know the archetypes.
In dreams, you dialogue with your parts passively while you sleep. Active imagination, in contrast, requires your conscious participation. Here, you dialogue with the parts of your unconscious in your imagination.
Jung prescribed active imagination for people overwhelmed with too many dream images. Jungians also use it to support dream work.
The four steps of Active Imagination are:
- Invite a particular part within your unconscious
- Actively dialogue with this part
- Add the ethical element of values
- Make it concrete with physical ritual
It is best to write out the dialogue you have during active imagination as it helps to bring the unconscious material further into consciousness.
If you’re interested in a concise, detailed instruction on how to use dream work and active imagination, Robert Johnson’s Inner Work is the best and most accessible book I’ve found.
Method #3: Psychosynthesis
The founder of psychosynthesis Roberto Assagioli noted:
We are not unified; we often feel that we are, because we do not have many bodies and many limbs, and because one hand doesn’t usually hit the other. But, metaphorically, that is exactly what does happen within us. Several subpersonalities are continually scuffling: impulses, desires, principles, aspirations are engaged in an unceasing struggle.
The stages of psychosynthesis are similar to active imagination:
- Recognition: A subpersonality emerges through some inner conflict or dream image.
- Acceptance: You have a willingness to work with this subpersonality.
- Coordination: You manage the relationship between multiple subpersonalities.
- Integration: You resolve the conflict between the subpersonalities, establishing cohesion.
- Synthesis: You discover of the Transpersonal Self beyond the subpersonalities.
As in Jung’s inner work, the goal of psychosynthesis is unity consciousness in contrast to a family of disjointed subpersonalities.
The most accessible book I’ve found on psychosynthesis is Piero Ferrucci’s What We May Be.
Method #4: Internal Family Systems (IFS)
IFS is the most modern and perhaps most robust system for working with subpersonalities to date.
Robert Schwartz, a psychologist with a background in family therapy, developed IFS. He was working with numerous patients who all spoke of voices in their heads telling them to, for example, overeat and then purge.
At first, he thought he was dealing with multiple personality disorders. But after inquiring how these patients heard these voices, shocked, he heard them too.
These voices, or parts as they call them in IFS, play characteristic roles that help define a person’s inner world.
All of these parts, Schwartz recognize, constellate around a wise leader, called the Self. The Self is mature, loving, compassionate, curious, and kind. It can heal and integrate the various parts.
Here’s an outline of the IFS model. IFS is a comprehensive system with a rich language to help you understand your psyche and work with your subpersonalities.
For a step-by-step guide to using IFS, see Jay Earley’s Self-Therapy (audiobook).
Questions for Archetypal Psychology
Regardless of which method you use, the process is similar. You get to know your subpersonalities through dialogue.
Here’s a list of questions psychologist John Rowan has found to be the most useful in working with his clients:
- What do you look like?
- How old are you?
- What situations bring you out?
- What is your approach to the world?
- What is your basic motive for being there?
- What do you want?
- What do you need?
- What have you got to offer?
- What are your blocks to full functioning?
- Where did you come from?
- When did you first meet (name of person)? What was going on?
- What would happen if you took over permanently?
- What helps you to grow?
- How do you relate to women/men/children?
Rowan also says it’s important to give the subpersonality a name, as it helps if you want to go back to him or her later.
Working Alone versus with a Therapist
Archetypal Psychology is still in its infancy.
All of the above integrative therapies were designed for trained professionals. And there are certified training for all of them.
However, individuals can use these methods for personal development, assuming you meet two criteria:
- You take the time to learn a system. Consciousness/cognition is necessary to work with your parts.
- You are mentally stable and grounded.
If you don’t meet these criteria, seek professional guidance.
I have used all of the above methods over the past five years. However, I worked with several qualified IFS practitioners initially to gain confidence in my ability as I continued to do the inner work on my own.
The Key to Archetypal Psychology
We use the mind to get to know what’s inside the mind. And archetypes are inside the mind. Can you see why it’s challenging to work with archetypes?
Only the Self—your psychic center—can organize the mind. And yet, the Self is often unavailable because archetypes command our attention.
Taoist and Buddhist psychology explain the situation with the concept of the host and guests in a house.
The house represents the psyche. The guests are the pantheon of archetypes within this house.
These guests are mostly ill-mannered. They are often nasty to each other; they don’t play well together.
The host’s job is to establish order and harmony within the household. The problem is that, for most of us, there’s no host to keep order.
We need the host (Self) to bring order to our psyche. This host doesn’t have feelings; it doesn’t judge or evaluate. The host is clear, neutral, and empty. It’s unaffected by the thoughts and feelings of the guests.
So before you engage in any psychological work, especially archetypal psychology, it’s important to ground yourself and find your center.
If you enter a state of mastery first, you can navigate through the characters in your mind. If you don’t, the guests remain in control of your house.
See The Mastery Method for an effective technique for entering a state of mastery.
Further Reading and Exploration: Archetypes Psychology
Theory
Kings, Warriors, Magicians, Lovers by Robert Moore and Douglas Gillette
Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious by Carl Jung
Subpersonalities by John Rowan
Practice
Self-Therapy by Jay Earley (IFS)
Inner Work by Robert Johnson (Jungian)
Embracing Our Selves by Hal and Sidra Stone (Voice Dialogue)
What We May Be by Piero Ferrucci (Psychosynthesis)
Read Next
10 Best Books in Psychology to Learn the Forces That Drive You
Your Real Magic by Recollecting Your Projection
A Beginner’s Guide to Carl Jung’s Individuation Process
The 4 Best Nootropic Supplements to Boost Your Brain’s Potential
Hi Scott,
Is there a way to ‘activate’ a particular archetype in our psyche? Do we indeed already do that in some unconscious way? Could we do it consciously?
Thanks
Hi Nesreen,
Our starting point as adults is that we are consumed by a complete cast of characters. Essentially, most of us are more archetypes than humans.
The entire goal of the individuation process is to establish structure and organization in the psyche so that we become more human (and less archetypal), more spontaneous and less contrived.
Can you “activate” a particular archetype? Yes, you can evoke or call them forth in your imagination. You can wear symbols that are associated with a particular archetype. Films and music can evoke archetypes as well.
You can wear clothes that trigger archetypes too. Under Armour, for example, can activate the warrior archetype in some people.
Hi Scott. Someone asked me what is a practical way To understand their drive, motivation, their reason for doing things. Archetypes (voice dialogue?) seems to offer a key. What other things are necessary to create as accessible a picture as possible in answering this question in your opinion ?
Hi Mark,
Archetypes are certainly a major component.
It’s also important to understand needs:
https://scottjeffrey.com/abraham-maslow-hierarchy-of-needs/
Values:
https://scottjeffrey.com/spiral-dynamics/
Among other variables…
You can also use paper (or chalkboard which allows editing rather than having to shred a pile of scrap paper) – I have been using my Linkedin posts. You are therefore objectifying your link to the archetype (as an external object), rather than holding in your head. You can also script, edit, reduce, enhance, link as tokens and affirmations…
Is it possible to get this as a pdf?
Yes, the PDF version is available above.
You are a Godsend!
Thank you so much 😊
You’re welcome, Lorna.
Hi Scott,
What is your definition as an archetypal hero?
of a**
Hi Nora,
See this guide:
https://scottjeffrey.com/hero-archetype/
Dear Scott, I appreciate your guidance and your interest in paving a way to the unconscious. Said that I am sure you are aware of a confusion of terms in your comments and responders between archetypal energy (invisible) and archetypal figures. Jung is very clear on the difference. What Nasreen wants to call fourth is a figure of imagination, an image, yes archetypal but not the archetype.
Archetypal figures are expressions of archetypal energy. Forms can represent archetypes, but they are not archetypes themselves.
I feel like we are all robots living our lives under all these archetypes who live inside our heads…will the real me please stand up..will you really know the real you???
I understand how you feel, Kathleen.
The key is to learn how to find your Center. It’s like returning home to yourself.
https://scottjeffrey.com/center-yourself/
Kathleen:
I’d like to take a stab at your question. I believe “getting to know the real you” is a lifelong process, not a place we arrive at. Having died once, I have a unique experience in floating past self and “feeling/sensing” the gestalt of my being.
So, I believe we have moments of numinous clarity; a clarity that aligns the electromagnetic essence of being human (remembers our heart has electrical impulse) in complete coherence and when that happens, we have an ah-ha moment. Or (really cool to think about) visa versa – when we experience an ah-ha moment we could measure our HRV (heart rate variability) and show near perfect “coherence.” I should note this is cutting edge research coming out of HeartMath in California.
So, can we ever really know ourselves? Yes – in moments of clarity; when we realize a vital piece of “the puzzle of mind” as I refer to it – and viola – inspiration is born and you immediately feel elated. Here’s the cool thing – creating art can do that quicker for us! So, inspiration, creating artwork, meditating, journaling, singing, playing an instrument, reading an inspiring book – all of these can make those numinous moments of self-awareness happen more often. Oh! add to the list feeling gratitude and helping someone else out. (Research is now confirming that when we give – we get. You cannot separate these two.) As the adage goes, “it is in giving that we receive.”
Hope this is food for thought – an opening or a portal for thought.
Namaste,
janet
In your experience, does it feel different to be in the presence of or interacting with someone whose Self has assumed the leadership position in the psyche, vs. those who are largely unconsciously identified with various conflicted parts/archetypes?
I arrived at this article after reading the guide on energy vampires. Both topics are very interesting to me. I imagine that being in the presence of a Self-managed person will feel differently depending on where one is at in their own path to self-actualization; but what comes to mind is that someone might be more likely to feel calm and peaceful around someone whose Self is in the leadership role. However I bet it could also be possible to feel “calm, peaceful” and otherwise “good” if someone (e.g. a healer or therapist) has actually transferred energy to a client (probably while also taking some as well) due to unconsciously acting out of an archetype like e.g. Savior. I imagine that the latter sort of dynamic could actually hinder a client’s progress or otherwise cause harm.
It’s fun to talk and think about this stuff!
P.S. I apologize if this comment has been duplicated–I tried to submit it while using a different browser and I don’t think it worked.
The more adept you are at observing the unconscious of another, the more you noticed how most people are shifting from one part/archetype to another rather often. You also begin to observe which archetypes are possessing various individuals.
I’m not certain if someone is switching parts if they can feel the presence of someone in their Center. As you alluded to, someone can feel calm in front of an individual possessed by the Guru or Savior archetype (assuming they have an active Spiritual Student or Devotee archetype operating in them).
But the more you abide in your Center, the more you can observe when someone else is “holding their energy” inside of them too.
Thanks Scott. I’m glad to be aware of this now and I’ve been inspired to start a practice that will result in being in my Center and help me notice more when I’m not. Though I had some contact with Jung’s work before, this time I heard it at a deeper level. I also really like the IFS model. I’m starting to observe the archetypes working through myself and others and hopefully this will build momentum over time. Thank you for making these articles available for free.
Sure thing, Samantha. The more awareness and attention you bring to this material, the more it will open up for you.
In the beginning, we all tend to have natural skepticism and various ego defense mechanisms that keep us from clearly and openly observing without judgment. The more you practice holding to your center and access your Observer Mind, the more evident it all becomes.
I am so glad I came across your website:). I have been paying attention to dreams for a while now, and have started to draw them. I’m going to keep reading and keep growing :)
Terrific, Patricia. That’s a wonderful and enriching practice.
Hello! I’ve read your article about the archetypes. I would like to know what are the differences between archetypes and stereotypes? How does it related? I am so sorry for the sudden questions. But I badly want to know more about archetypes and stereotypes. I really do enjoy reading your articles!
Thank you so much in advance.
Have a nice day.
Hi Channie,
Stereotypes are socially conditioned labels for specific categories of people.
Archetypes are deeply-rooted patterns of behaviors that transcend social and cultural conditioning.
That said, a stereotype like a “jock” is likely linked to specific archetypal behaviors — as well as images (appearance). So stereotypes and archetypes are related.
Stereotypes are more at the observable surface. Archetypes are deeply entrenched in our psyches.
Thanks for writing all of this. I started working on this a couple of years ago without consciously realizing this was what I was doing. I have recently identified an extremely adversarial archetype within my personal suite who I am trying to get to know better. As one might imagine, this archetype does not make it easy. I appreciate your layout of example questions and approaches.
When it comes to an archetype who exists purely to be adversarial (and loves it!) do you have any advice as to how to reach a mutually beneficial arrangement? He is not particularly keen on being “healed” or “properly socialized” because for him it is the same as being wholly eradicated. This tendency used to be predominant within my day-to-day life, and as I pursued healing it somewhat diminished until (as far as I am aware) only he is left of it, and he mostly makes himself known in the form of frankly repulsive intrusive thoughts, an issue I did not have until recently.
It is my personal belief that he is making some form of grand last stand, here, but as a primal aspect of the human (and my) psyche I would rather seek some form of, again, mutually beneficial arrangement rather than attempt to eradicate the archetype entirely. Which approach would you say is more likely to result in a functional, thriving, and cohesive existence? Thank you :)
So my response to your question, Theo, is going to be out of alignment with schools like IFS and the Jungians.
Years ago, I would have said that every part can be integrated to form a “happy internal family” or a mutually beneficial arrangement, as you said.
But with closer observation and experience, I think this is overly idealistic and not grounded in reality. As such, this belief can add internal tension and therefore unneeded suffering.
The reality is that there are parts within our psyche that won’t be integrated. Instead, they just need to be contained.
The ancient Taoists understood this. Instead of trying to reconcile with each individual part (which they often referred to as rowdy guests and sometimes “monsters”), they focused on restoring the Original Spirit by accessing the Center. This Original Spirit is akin to the Higher Self depending on how you define it.
The Original Spirit then establishes order. It can watch the rowdy guests without needing to come to any agreements — simply by inner observation.
So you may notice specific times or triggers when the archetypal entity in question becomes active. You’ll likely find that it’s when you’re already out of sorts — that is, you’re out of your Center. Hold to your Center for long enough, and this impulse will likely reside.
Excellent, thank you so much for taking the time to respond. This is completely in alignment with my feelings on the matter and works very well as encouragement I need to continue shifting my behavior away from indulging things which make me uneasy and will probably come back to bite later if given a chance to.
This did start to surge up when I started doing more work on grounding myself and accessing a higher perspective full time, so I would wager this archetype is rebelling against a new order which it finds troublesome and threatening, so, in other words, is in its own way probably a good sign to keep getting my situation together. Appreciate the feedback :)
I realized there is some contradiction in how I said I want things to be mutually beneficial, and also not encourage this archetype, so to clarify: I am of two minds regarding a utilitarian perspective (don’t throw out what can be useful) and a healing perspective (if it’s rotten, probably don’t eat it). Sometimes it’s tough to tell the difference between the two, but in this case I think you’re correct that this isn’t worth the time and the response did shine a light on a deeper issue with mistrust I was neglecting in favor of a utilitarian take. Just seems worth clarifying, lol.
Sure thing, Theo.
The important thing to keep in mind is that there are forces within the psyche that aren’t always personal or related to our origin stories. They simply exist. And so trying to “work with them” can prove futile.
Thank you, I’m gonna take this down for future reference. Seems like it will come in handy. Appreciate all the work and info 🙏
Hello Scott, I must thank you for sharing the/your knowledge. I found your approach to the psyche very helpful and easy to understand. Not many people have the gift to pass on information the way you do. Thank you again. I wonder if you have anything writing regarding Anima-Animus integration? How to establish an open communication with those part of ourself. I will appreciate your thoughts.
Best Regards
Sergio
Hi Sergio,
Thank you for the feedback.
I have avoided addressing Anima/Animus integration for numerous reasons. The main reason is that I don’t entirely agree with Jung’s assertions or conclusions on the topic.
Jung thought he found confirmation to his theories on Anima/Animus when he was given a copy of an ancient Taoist text titled, “The Secret to the Golden Flower” translated by Richard Wilhem. As Thomas Cleary points out in his later translation (which is far superior), it was clear that Wilhem did not have an extensive background in either Buddism or Taoism and Wilhem’s translations were poor and confused. Jung drew parallels from this translation that was simply not there.
If anything, I would say that the Anima in a man represents an idealized version of his mother (from the first 10 years of the boy’s life). Vice versa for a woman. (In this way, Freud was closer to the mark with his Oedipal/Electra complex explanation.)
Getting to know this idealized projection involves understanding the overall psychology, attitudes, behaviors, feelings, and life experiences of the parent of the opposite sex during your childhood — and then recollecting all of your projections about this parent. This process can certainly be useful in the context of an adult relationship because we generally live within our projections. But this process isn’t likely essential for returning to the Self (contrary to Jung’s assertions).
Also, I’m not sure that it’s wise to personify this projection and try to communicate it. This may give more “life” to something that probably shouldn’t be there in the first place.
In a world where it’s rare for a man to truly be masculine and a woman to truly be feminine, this topic of Anima/Animus can easily become more confused. (And there are strong social, cultural, and environmental reasons for all of this gender confusion.)
When the Taoist spoke of terms like the “Mysterious Female” they were either referring to specific locations within the body (when speaking in terms of energetics) or qualities of “Yin” like receptivity and openness (when speaking in terms of consciousness). It wasn’t about masculine/feminine as we generally conceive these terms.