
The Ultimate Guide to Achieving Epic Peak Performance in Work (and Anything Else)
by Scott JeffreyDo you know that indescribable feeling of performing at your best?
The volume on the world turns down.
Internal resistance falls away, and with it, your sense of self.
Fully absorbed in the task at hand, you access more of your innate potential.
We can pursue peak performance in whatever field interests us:
Sports, business, music, arts, negotiation, selling, mathematics, philosophy, writing, to name a few.
But consistent peak performance often eludes us.
Peaking is the exception, not the rule.
In this guide, we will explore the science of peak performance to discover ways to access this state with greater consistency.
Table of Contents
- The Anatomy of Peak Performance
- The Key to Cultivating Talent
- The Art of Deep Practice
- Deep Practice Strengthens the Brain
- The Inner Game of Peak Performance
- The Battle With Our Inner Saboteur
- Why We Fail to Perform at Our Best
- A Formula for Performance
- The Science of Flow
- Realizing Unconscious Competence
- Peak Experience and Self-Actualization
- Three Elements of Focus Necessary for Peak Performance
- How to Silence the Inner Critic
- The Power of Attention
- How to Hack Peak Performance
- What do you think?
The Anatomy of Peak Performance
There are two critical components for peak performance:
- Your talent or ability and
- Your internal framework or mental state.
All available research on talent and learning suggests we’re not born with talent.
We cultivate talent through deliberate, deep practice.
The Key to Cultivating Talent
Let’s say you want to improve your skills in tennis. You have a strong forehand, but a weak backhand. Your overall performance will increase by strengthening your backhand.
To accomplish this, you need to embrace the discomfort, focusing attention and effort on your backhand. It’s awkward at first.
But by staying conscious of your movements as you strike the ball with your backhand, you get feedback.
You notice:
- How you feel when you swing the racket and contact the ball, and
- Where the ball lands on the court.
And perhaps you get additional feedback and suggestions from a coach.
If you pay attention to this feedback, adjusting your performance through repetition, you improve.
The Art of Deep Practice
In The Talent Code, Daniel Coyle explains:
Deep practice feels a bit like exploring a dark and unfamiliar room. You start slowly, you bump into furniture, stop, think, and start again. Slowly, and a little painfully, you explore the space over and over, attending to errors, extending your reach into the room a bit farther each time, building a mental map until you can move through it quickly and intuitively.
The key to improving your talent is knowing where you want to grow and then breaking the technique down into smaller chunks.
That’s why top performers have master coaches, as Coyle’s research on talent exposed.
A peak performance coach knows where to direct your attention at that particular moment of your development.
For example, before you learn to transition between chords on a guitar, you first practice strumming and hitting your chords cleanly. Learning these skills takes deep practice.
At first, the tips of your fingers are soft, the muscles in your fingers are weak, and your fingers lack the dexterity to maintain the proper positions on the guitar’s frets.
As Coyle wrote, you start in a dark, unfamiliar room.
Deep Practice Strengthens the Brain
Through deep practice, our brain grows myelin, a kind of insulation between neurons that reinforces neural connections.
The more myelin you have, the more automatic your response becomes. With practice, your mental map brightens the room.
Learning anything takes us through four stages:
- Unconscious incompetence
- Conscious incompetence
- Conscious competence
- Unconscious competence
Myelin gets stronger between the third and fourth stage.
For mastery and peak performance, our goal is to realize unconscious competence.
Here, we can perform a task well without effort or concentration.
The Inner Game of Peak Performance
But talent is only part of the story. Many talented people rarely achieve peak performance. They fail to realize their innate potential.
Sadly, this is the case for most of us. Why? Because achieving peak performance requires mastering the inner game.
Timothy Gallwey was a nationally ranked tennis player and the captain of his Harvard University team in the 1960s.
Then, he went to India and met a guru who taught him meditation techniques. Gallwey noticed how these methods increased his concentration and improved his game.
In 1974 his book, The Inner Game of Tennis hit the market. It became a bestseller as did his follow-up books Inner Skiing and The Inner Game of Golf.
These books were revolutionary. Instead of focusing on external techniques, they highlighted the athlete’s internal state.
As an expert tennis coach, Gallwey realized that if he could help a player remove or reduce the mental obstacles to their performance, an unexpected natural ability flows with little need for technical input.
Author Steven Pressfield’s character Bagger Vance, a mystical golf mentor to Rannulph Junuh in The Legends of Bagger Vance (film), shares similar wisdom.
In the movie version, Bagger Vance says,
Inside each and every one of us is one true, authentic swing. Something we was born with, that’s ours and ours alone. Something can’t be taught to you or learned. Something that’s got to be remembered.
Over time, the world can rob us of that swing and [it gets] buried inside us under all our woulda’s and coulda’s and shoulda’s. Some folk even forget what their swing was like.
Bagger Vance plays the role of our Divine inner coach. In this scene from Robert Redford’s version of the story, watch how Bagger Vance helps Junuh get out of his way.
The Battle With Our Inner Saboteur
So if we’re open to the idea that we have a natural talent—an inborn, authentic swing in whatever field that interests us—why do most of us rarely experience it?
The answer is because we get hijacked by our inner saboteur.
If we observe our minds, there’s a constant internal dialogue between multiple voices or parts.
In his Inner Game series, Gallwey distinguishes two selves: Self 1 and Self 2.
Self 1 is the voice that commands and criticizes.
Self 2 stays quiet and does the actions.
Self 1 is the brain (prefrontal cortex). Self 1 instructs.
Self 2 is the subconscious mind or body. Self 2 acts.
When we watch this inner dialogue between Self 1 and Self 2, we observe several things:
- Self 1 is very bossy, critical, and unfriendly.
- The conversation is one-sided; Self 2 doesn’t say much.
- There’s little trust between these two selves.
Even though Self 2 does the work, Self 1 often intervenes and tries to take control.
Why We Fail to Perform at Our Best
Put simply, when Self 1 tries to dominate Self 2, we tense up and make mistakes.
Self 2 is our Center. It’s intuitive; it knows what to do. Self 1 only knows about what to do.
Self 1 is our personality, or what the Taoists call the acquired mind. This acquired mind is conditioned by our environment, by anyone that’s ever judged us.
First, someone judges us (usually our parents, teachers, and peers), and then an inner judge or inner critic is born in us.
And so Self 1, when in control, hijacks our performance in anything we do.
Imagine having someone stand next to you as you write, play music, or compete in sports that continuously tells you why you’ll fail, what you’re doing wrong, and why you can’t do it right.
It’s like being a comedian with a heckler sitting in the front row.
Well, that’s what happens most of the time internally for the majority of us.
When Self 1 doesn’t trust Self 2, we get tripped up by a myriad of interferences.
A Formula for Performance
Gallwey offers a simple formula:
Performance = Potential – Interference
When Self 1 doesn’t intervene, we can enter a state of flow and become immersed in whatever we are doing.
The Science of Flow
You’ve heard the term “being in the zone.” Psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi has studied peak performers throughout his career, popularizing what he calls flow.
Flow is a mental state where an individual is absorbed in his performance with an energized focus, engagement, and enjoyment in the activity.
In Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Csikszentmihalyi outlines seven elements or conditions for flow:
- A challenging activity that requires skill. Too little challenge leads to boredom. Too much challenge brings anxiety. Enjoyment occurs in the sweet spot between the two.
- The merging of action and awareness. When all of our internal resources are engaged, there’s no psychic energy left for Self 1 to engage in counter-productive dialogue. Instead, a person becomes absorbed with full awareness of the activity itself.
- Clear goals and feedback. The more awareness we bring to an activity, the more feedback we receive both internally and externally. Goals or a clear vision gives us a personal sense of what peak performance looks like in advance.
- Concentration on the task at hand. All distraction falls away. Immersed in an enjoyable activity, the mind (Self 1) has no space for irrelevant information (like rumination).
- The paradox of control. Self 1 clings to wanting control, which creates tension. When we’re in a flow state, we experience a sense of being in control while not clinging to it. The desire or worry about control falls away.
- The loss of self-consciousness. The more we cling to our self-concepts and self-identity, the more we inhibit flow. Without interference from Self 1, we merge with the activity itself. We find our “authentic swing.”
- The transformation of time. One common theme in flow states and other altered states of consciousness is that one’s perception of time changes. Freedom from the “tyranny of time” adds to the enjoyment of our activities.
This flow state is another way of describing unconscious competence.
Realizing Unconscious Competence
In Beyond Boredom and Anxiety, Csikszentmihalyi writes:
In the flow state, action follows upon action according to an internal logic that seems to need no conscious intervention by the actor. He experiences it as a unified flowing from one moment to the next, in which he is in control of his actions, and in which there is little distinction between self and environment, between stimulus and response, or between past, present, and future.
I recall the process of learning how to type in high school.
At first, the process was awkward. You have to be aware of your finger positions:
ASDF JKL;
Then, you learn how to shift your fingers up and down from those positions, returning to their starting point.
Q and Z were particularly tricky. Reaching up to the numbers seemed unfathomable. But when you develop the motor skills to type fluidly you achieve conscious competence.
Still, you don’t trust yourself, shifting your eyes back and forth from the keyboard to the computer. (Back then, it was a word-processing keyboard, not a computer.)
The teacher assesses your typing proficiency by two factors: speed (words per minute) and accuracy (how many mistakes you make).
I typed slower when I looked at the keyboard, but I was more accurate. My typing speed increased when I gazed at the page of words I was typing.
But true typing speed didn’t come until I trusted myself. I was typing about 60 words per minute on average with Self 1 still engaged.
When I trusted my fingers—essentially letting go and trusting Self 2—my speed increased to over 90 words per minute.
Self 1 was interfering with my performance. To Self 1, mistakes are unacceptable. With Self 2 doing the typing, my speed increased by 50 percent.
I might have made a few more mistakes at this higher speed, but I attribute those errors to Self 1 injecting comments like, “Wow, look at how fast your typing,” and “You’re doing great. Keep up the good work.”
Comments from Self 1 interfere with our performance.
Peak Experience and Self-Actualization
Peak performers in every field enter flow states often. Abraham Maslow called these flow states peak experiences.
In his research, Maslow found that although anyone (including children) can have a peak experience, self-actualizing individuals have these heightened experiences more frequently.
Maslow’s findings suggest self-actualizing individuals are those people who have, consciously or not, discovered ways of silencing Self 1 when they’re doing what they love to do.
They have learned how to get out of their own way.
And these peak experiences, Maslow believed, are important for humanity.
Instead of seeing peak performance as something relegated to a gifted few, Maslow believed, these experiences are part of our biological destiny.
In Religions, Values, and Peak-Experiences, Maslow writes:
Man has a higher and transcendent nature, and this is part of his essence, i.e., his biological nature as a member of a species which has evolved.
Three Elements of Focus Necessary for Peak Performance
The key to peak performance is to maintain attention and focus on whatever we’re doing. Attention is critical for learning and proficiency in anything.
Distraction inhibits attention. While some distractions are external (like noises, other people, etc.), most of what disrupts our attention is internal, or what Gallwey calls self-interference.
Gallwey highlights three factors that enable us to focus (stay in Self 2):
Awareness: Focus of attention on a particular task.
Choice: Our desires determine where we place our focus. In The Inner Game of Work, Gallwey writes,
Desire drives focus. Our choice is over which desires to nourish and which to starve. Nourishing the desires of Self 2 builds stability and leads toward self-fulfillment. The nurturing of Self 1 desires strengthens self-interference and leads to inner conflict and distraction.
Trust: We can focus when we let go of mental control. When Self 1 is in command, it provides instructions on what to do or poses questions that lead to doubt. Again from Gallwey:
Doubt leads to confusion and to paralysis of action. When you are focused, you are conscious of your purpose, fully engaged in the present, and the voice of Self 1 is not heard.
How to Silence the Inner Critic
How do you usually try to focus on or improve your performance?
If you’re like me, you may try to force your inner critic into submission or just try harder.
In a sense, we try to fight with Self 1. It doesn’t work. What we resist grows stronger. And so resisting the impulses of Self 1 only makes the voice of Self 1 stronger and louder.
So what’s the alternative?
Gallwey suggests choosing Self 2—acknowledge its desire and allow it to express itself. He observes:
Once I can acknowledge Self 2, I can reach for it and give it whatever attention I have at my disposal. By that conscious choice I am ignoring the voices of self-interference. A little attention is withdrawn from Self 1, diminishing its influence, and I simultaneously gain greater access to the resources of Self 2.
Makes sense, right? But how do we choose Self 2? The first step is always to increase self-awareness.
We learn to feel the difference between the compulsive forces of Self 1 and Self 2’s natural drives. From Gallwey:
Self 1 desire feels as if I’m being driven by a tight hand at the wheel, Self 2 as if I’m doing the driving with a relaxed but firm grip. Self 2 is naturally joyous in its expression of its excellence; Self 1 is trying to prove itself or earn something it often doesn’t think it really deserves.
The Power of Attention
Perhaps you’re noticing a theme in many of my guides: self-awareness and the skill of attention.
Whether it’s owning your shadow, strengthening self-leadership, changing your mindset, or integrating your body-mind, the skill of directing attention inward is vital. The same goes for achieving peak performance in any activity.
Gallwey confirms:
There is no general skill more important to learning and the achievement of excellence than focus of attention. Like most skills, focus requires practice and conscious effort. Unlike most skills, though, it can be practiced during any and every activity—mental or physical.
With greater attention and focus, we then strengthen the muscles of conscious choice. We choose the body’s instinctual drives (Self 2) while weakening the tendencies of our mental chatter (Self 1).
How to Hack Peak Performance
There are things you can do to quiet Self 1’s interference.
Remember Self 1 is the brain; Self 2 is the body. Self 1 lowers our performance because it’s usually in the driver’s seat.
In essence, our minds impede optimal performance.
When Bagger Vance said you have to get out of your own way and let your swing find you, this translates to: get out of your mind and into your body.
Removing resistance is the key to achieving optimal performance in virtually any activity—even business.
So it follows: to silence Self 1, get rooted in your body first.
Here are four guides to help you get rooted in your body:
15 Powerful Centering Methods to Reduce Anxiety, Increase Focus, and Make Better Decisions
How to Ground Yourself to the Earth to Achieve Instant Calm and Regain Your Center
Cultivate Boundless Energy With an Ancient Chinese Internal Martial Art Called Zhan Zhuang
How to Breathe Like a Jedi to Improve Mental Clarity, Energy, Emotional Resilience, and Productivity
Do these activities to set the conditions for peak performance. Master these methods.
Use them before you learn, train, or engage in any activity that requires your focus and attention.
You’ll upgrade your abilities in ways you can’t imagine.
What do you think?
Now it’s your turn.
Share your thoughts, comments, and questions below.
I understood.
I am a kind of person whose performance is measured by the processes set in place, and see the product of my labour to be fruitful, not.
For instance, I learnt rap. I was not good at it at all at first. However, having to relate a lot of my energy with Eminem’s actions, I decided to learn through a mentor.
As time went by, my conscious acquired mind was concerned with feeling ‘more right’, meanwhile my subconscious mind dealt with my persuasive writing skills in a form of writing punchlines.
And here’s a funny experience while crafting a punchline, I would not care how right I am… In my subconscious, I am ‘less wrong’. The energy was different to Eminem’s action, but the common link in between us was that as much as the flow isn’t as good as his [Eminem], I was deliberately practicing to ‘copy and paste’ the best of my abilities through emulating him.
My mentor picked this up. And gave me feedback.
“Tshepang, throw your mind in the sea.”
Maybe that was an allegory for self 1 to get loose it, and let self 2 take the drive.
And maybe, self 1 is the conscious mind that intervenes the subconscious self 2. Self 2 relates to emotions, the punchline maker. Self 1 relates to logic, rationalising why you should not make the punchline to be as good as emoting it mindlessly.
As time went, I had myself to emulate as I was conscious competent. However, I skewed more on gauging my performance with self 1, limiting self 2.
It was a bit hard, as I was only around 11 to 14 at the time. I did not understand myself that well, let alone, deal with my internal resistance in a thoughtful manner that did not disrupt me to being too emotional.
As time went by, yeah…
… I dodged rap. Although, with benefits.
I unconsciously became competent in persuasive writing. Because you are using emotions when you write, right?
Anyways, it was a reflective experience while reading this article. Hope you understood well by what I explained.
It sounds like you’re mostly sharing your experience, Tshepang, so I don’t have much to comment on. In terms of using emotions when you write, you can be — it depends on the “mental” and “emotional” state in which you’re writing, and from which archetype you’re writing. For example, the poet might be emotional, while the philosopher is more analytical.
First, I want to say that your material always resonates with me. It’s always well done. Thanks so much for your effort. Next, I wanted to say how closely the techniques in this article align with yoga philosophy. Yogis use the breath and body to bypass the mind (self 1) to overcome Avidya (ignorance) so that the observer / Purusha can emerge (self 2). The 8 rungs of yoga ultimately lead to samadhi (integration) which sounds a lot like the flow state. Anyway I digress. It’s fascinating. Thanks again!
Yes, Timothy Gallwey actually arrived at the insights about the Inner Game after meeting with a Yogi.
All of the Eastern traditions use methods to overcome Self 1 and rest in Self 2. Only they use it not for higher performance, but for transcending the mind.
I love it! Very insightful and practical. That’s why professional athletes are practicing meditation. Thanks for all your amazing work Scott!
Exactly, Chio. Anything we can do to quiet the mind helps increase our performance. Thanks for your comment. :-)
And another Magnificent instructional by Mr.Jeffrey. Wow. Who knew that somebody could organize information in such a profoundly effective manner as the way you do. I honestly deeply admire you for some of these behavior manuels that you have put on here, and am so glad i have the chance to look and learn about the things you write about.
Your great dude! Your success in presentation and source refferencing is boldly evident.
I promise you that any people i come across that have an ear to listen, will hear me giving a full blooded reccomendation to your work.
Thank you so much for all the work you do!!
:]
Thank you for the glowing testimonial, Zack.
After reading many hundreds of books, writing well over a million words, and making tons of mistakes, I’m confident anyone could produce similar results — as long as they are playing to their interests.
Scott, another masterpiece! I really enjoyed this article and it connected many dots for me. Thank you very much!
Thank you, Michael. That’s great to hear! You’re most welcome.
Wow! How selfless of you to share this with us. I coached, more than 40 years, and my teams used many of these techniques. Today I am still involved in human performance and always looking for ways to improve. You have amassed important information and gifted it to those who will use it. Positive Karma is yours.
Thanks for the comments, Peter. Given your background, I’m sure much of the material presented here was just a good review. Best wishes.
I sensed that the pyramid was not true , we have to turn it upside down to be in touch with our creativity. The way it was presented was to encourage consumerism which makes people fodder for the capitalist system . Thank you for making me feel I am right.
I assume you’re referring to Maslow.
I don’t think it’s accurate to say Maslow’s pyramid should be turned upside down. Biological and safety drivers are far more important to meet than self-actualization. The point was that a pyramid isn’t necessarily a pyramid in the first place.
Thank you for your amazing generosity and for the exceptionally high quality of the material presented.
I am a yoga teacher and really appreciate the weaving of mindfulness/meditation with psychology.
Thank you for the feedback, Lisa.
Those two worlds (meditation and psychology) can certainly dance together nicely.
Thanks for the inspiration. However, personally I believe my self 1 is actually the trainer of self 2. Like you write when I learn something new I have to consciously see the errors and correct pathways. This is what self 1 does. After a lot of this a new activity becomes unconscious and ideally I become competent at it. So self 1 and 2 are one. Our task is just to let both parts act where they are needed – self 1 for conscious step-by-step improvement and training of self 2. Self 2 whenever we do things we already trained well with self 1. A good driver (self 2) needs no instructor (self 1). A bad driver however can’t improve without it.
You would be surprised what Self 2 is capable of without the inner criticism and commentary of Self 1 — even when learning things that are new to you.
Self 2 adapts and learns by feeling, sensing, and intuitive knowing. It has access to information Self 1 can never “learn.” The body is far wiser than most of us realize.
In the context of the information presented in this guide, as long as Self 1 is the driver, mastery of anything will never be reached. But this statement can only be verified via experience.
I love reading your posts very informative and extremely helpful thank you
Thank you for your feedback, Sharon.
This is amazing and fascinating. Thank you Scott. I’m looking for the Tiger Woods video which I can’t seem to find again. Could you please assist me.
You’re welcome, Khanyisani. I don’t know what you’re referring to regarding Tiger Woods.
Wow thank you Scott! Every e-mail I find myself growing more and more. You have a very grounded way of explaining everything. I will definitely be enrolling in one of your courses in due time. Keep up the good work!
Glad to hear that you’re enjoying the material, Jonathan. Thank you for the feedback.
This is a great summary, thank you so much for sharing your insights Scott!
You’re welcome, Casey!
My Dear, I am very happy and sufficient with these materials above all all the psychological fields I like too. I have some problem of health, thanks to God I am becoming better and better . So thank you so much.
You’re welcome, Kifle.
Thank you Scott, you are doing a great job and I have learnt alots through your materials, very helpful!
Thank you, I enjoyed reading this. We need to listen to our intuition (self 2) more.